Welcome to the First Coast Tea Party
USA Survival News: Seasick: The Law of the Sea Treaty
We all need to be right on top of what this treaty means and write, write, write. This is enormous and will require a constitutional amendment to get out of if these treasonous members of the senate vote to approve a treaty that has been dorment for 30 years because passing it is NOT in our national interests.
..............................................................
The U.N.'s law of the Sea Treaty is the biggest giveaway of American sovereignty and resources since the Panama Canal Treaty. It lays the groundwork for another U.N. corruption scandal worse than oil-for-food. This report reveals:
- How the treaty creates three new U.N. bureaucracies.
- How the treaty sets up a scheme to facilitate bribes and payoffs to U.N. officials and employees with revenue derived from a global tax on America.
- How China stands to benefit from U.S. Senate ratification of the pact.
- How a U.N. Commission created by the treaty could hand over North Pole riches to Russia.
- Why employees of Law of the Sea Treaty institutions have signed up for benefits from the U.N. pension fund.
- How the International Seabed Authority of the treaty becomes an instrument of the U.N. Security Council.
- Why U.S. Navy officials and big corporations are supporting the treaty.
- How China and Third World countries dominate the Law of the Sea Treaty organization.
Those in favor of the U.N.'s Law of the Sea Treaty want desperately to avoid any mention of how the treaty was spawned by the corrupt U.N. and how its global tax mechanism will allow employees of the U.N. and member states to get their hands on billions of dollars.
The U.N.'s Law of the Sea Treaty could make the U.N.'s oil-for-food scandal, the largest financial fraud in history, look like peanuts.
In a letter distributed in 2004 by Senator Richard Lugar, a supporter of the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), eight former U.S. Department of State Legal Advisers stated that, "The fact that the term ‘United Nations' appears in the title of the LOS [Law of the Sea] Convention is legally meaningless and is an accident of history."
In fact, the preamble to UNCLOS alone has three references to the United Nations. First, it refers to UNCLOS as emerging from a United Nations
Two of the institutions created by the treaty, the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), have already joined the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund as member organizations. The U.N. pension fund, the best-managed program at the world body, has assets surpassing $36 billion. Such a move enables ISA and ITLOS employees to dip into these lucrative assets. The other body created by the treaty, the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS), maintains its websitethrough the U.N.'s Division for Oceans Affairs and the Law of the Sea.
The CLCS is the U.N. body that many in the media falsely claim has ownership or jurisdiction over the North Pole and Arctic oil, gas and mineral deposits. Ratification of UNCLOS would turn these resources over to the CLCS for dispersal to the Russians and other countries, despite the fact that American explorers discovered the Pole and U.S. Navy nuclear submarines were the first to travel under it.
Under the "Doctrine of Discovery" legal principle, therefore, the U.S. already has valid claims to the North Pole region, and accession to UNCLOS could sink any chance of America ever cashing in on the black gold. Passing UNCLOS would effectively undercut our historic claims to the region and turn the matter over to the CLCS, with 21 members from various countries.
It's true that the CLCS rejected some Russian claims to the Arctic region in 2002. It did so with information provided by the United States, proving that we didn't need to be a treaty member to play a role. But if the Senate ratifies this treaty and then a decision goes against our interests, the pressure will be enormous for the U.S. Government to comply. Indeed, the U.S. would be accused of violating international law if we rejected an UNCLOS finding. It is significant that on September 22, the Russian Natural Resources Ministry announced it had the "data" to prove that the North Pole is Russia's.
In addition to possibly benefiting Russia, the treaty creates a major funding source for the U.N. bureaucracy.
Views: 30
Comment
National Debt Clock
The First CoastTea Party is a non-profit organization. We have no deep-pocketed special interest funding our efforts.
You may contact us at:
First Coast Tea Party
1205 Salt Creek Island Dr
Ponte Vedra, FL 32082
904-392-7475
Helpful Links
Blog Posts
RYAN NICHOLS - Hardened Criminal?? Seriously??
If you're not already aware. This is what's going on in DC while dangerous criminals are allowed back out on the streets. It's horrifying that this is happening to our citizens and veterans for protesting the hijacking of our election process. This is still happening! They are STILL being tortured and treated like full on terrorists.
You may not be aware of the typical things they're forced to go through...…
ContinuePosted by Babs Jordan on August 14, 2022 at 8:44am
© 2024 Created by LeadershipCouncil.
Powered by
You need to be a member of First Coast Tea Party to add comments!
Join First Coast Tea Party