Comment

Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on January 18, 2012 at 9:14am

You are determined to have others reading this bolg site I'm a progressive.  I am a progressive as equally as you and Ron Paul are FASCISTS.  Was it your idol Goerbels or Himmler (famous Nazi Facsists) that stated, (paraphrasing) "state a lie often enough, long enough and the majority will accept it as truth."  So, carry on, but consider yourself outed.  As bad as that might seem, I still love you as a moral, decent person who joins me in the quest to rid ourselves of the current regime (all of it) and return to a constitutional republic.  OBAMA MUST GO!!!

I believe the primary goal immediately at hand is to obey the BILDEBURGERS-C.F.R. to use the commodity exchange of oil rather than FRN's from the FR as the paper is worthless.  This will be given the EUROBANX to bail out the european banques.  This is all based on the "threat" of Iran to close the Gulf Of Hormuz.  Obama, Bernake, Paulsen, Bumbling Biden, will pay for oil from Nigeria, Venezuela, Iraq, Oman, UAR, Qatar, Libya, Algeria, etc., and "GIVE" it to EUROPE.  IT WILL BE A COMMODITY BARTER.

Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on January 18, 2012 at 12:46am

I am more a patriot than you, who wishes to be dictated the terms of a fight you will not win; designed only to exhaust you mentally into submission to the inevitable realignment of government defined behavior.  Don't worry, after the briefing into the new thought, you will be comfortable once again.  Its not so much the potential that Ron Paul might win in a default (three way race); it is to be of concern for the utmost consideration be given to the Vice President.  Ron Paul wouldn't last (actuarily) for eight years.  A coup could be pulled where he could be "Baker Acted" and removed to a quiet sanitorium somewhere.  The difference might be where I know a quick collapse would mean a quick recovery.  A long, drawn out collapse means everyone grows comfortable with the situation and the liberals carry out their typical plan ever so incrementally.  The people of the U.S.A. deserve the government they give themselves.

Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on January 17, 2012 at 8:05pm

I am a simple person.  I am a Jeffersonian Democrat (original meaning).  I believe the U.S. Constitution means what it says.  I am not a progressive.  Teddy Roosevelt was a "progressive".  He was, after all, an old country dutchman and a Roosevelt.  (New york was originally Dutch).  Progressives are word-meaning manipulators.  Isn't the preamble of our Constitution the location of the phrase...and provide for the general welfare...which has been expanded to carry the connotation..."entitlement"...such as food stamps, section eight housing, medicaid?  Now, is not Social Security lumped into that morass; lumping in, like scrambling eggs, never to be separated again, those who paid and contibuted vs. those that are "entitled" because of their skin color, national origin, political party vote, etc...  At this juncture, I'm not opposed to the collapse of our currency, government et al, ad infinitum.  The greatest addiction the human animal has is hunger.  I know how to trap, hunt, build chickees, etc., thanx Dad!!!  I am able to skin anything.  Butcher, plant, know the edible Florida wild plants.  In a word, I'm ready for the worst case scenario.  I've already seen it in afrika, asia, south and central amerika.  Next stop, U.S.A.; IF THINGS DON'T TURN AROUND IN A HURRY!  Amerika deserves the government shes given.  Enjoy.

Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on January 17, 2012 at 1:52pm

I am beleaguered that you have the misdirection to confuse the time reference with the policies, what was driving the policies at the time.  One hundred years ago, we were enrapped by the "make like an Ostrich and stick your head in the sand".  Isolationism.  What was the purpose in attacking Tripoli and the barbary coast during the span of our fore-fathers?  I believe (discounting the war of Jenkins ear) that to be our first foray into international justified actions.  Did congress declare war on Tripoli? (Libya)?  No!  The sultan of tripoli declared war on the USA ( Jefferson presiding).  I've noticed Ron Paul has not issued a defensable statement regarding the beheading of two marines and the beheading AND GUTTING of two army specialists during Iraq war (which Ron Paul voted for before he positioned himself with Barack Obama against such later).  Paul claims he was in a MASH unit in theater in early sixites and my imagination conjures thoughts of the major infatuated with major houlihan.  Yep, no mention of our heroes.  Only disgracing soldiers for the edification of Ron's friends in Bahgdad, and Tehran.

Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on January 17, 2012 at 12:38pm

As Ronald Reagan said,"there you go again..."

Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on January 17, 2012 at 12:01pm

Everyone that has any historical political background is immune from the tactic of claiming the "high ground".  Newt in his Bi-polar erratics, tried to claim it also, and everyone saw through it, as this attempt is made.  The creation of the Federal Reserve was J.P. Morgans brain child.  His buddy, woodrow wilson legislated it through and I can't remember if Teddy Roosevelt was in on it also.  The 16th and 17th amendments are abominations against our constitution and God given liberties.  Ron Paul has a lot of support on these issues, but his foreign policy is over one hundred years out of date.  I don't remember Paul, in twenty five years, trying to submit (just submit) a repeal of the 16th and 17th amendments.  For twenty five years he's been an entertaining eccentric sea gull, eating, squaking, and dumping primarily anti-semetic rhetoric.  No wonder he wants to be nice with Al Qaida, Iran, and the Taliban.

Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on January 17, 2012 at 10:13am

I am humored to be a part of your "discourses", as I'm certain others with their opinions know that as long as you rhetorical wolves wait in paques to jump the next NON-RON PAUL advocate, you'll attempt to denegrate them into submission; in other words your are the "speech police" for a typical RON PAUL REGIME, where freedom of speech will not be tolerated, unless it is for the praise of RON PAUL.  Historically your anti-semetic support of HERR RON PAUL lead to the massacre of over six million individuals, unacceptable by your racist types.  I feel bad for Billie who placed this fine arena and format for non-hate discussion to be comandeered in your fashion.  Enjoy your hate.

Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on January 17, 2012 at 8:25am

No that's not what I'm saying...I've just exposed you as an "agent provocqueteur", a "propoganda minister" of Himmler's caliber.  You, like Paul, distort intent and take license not granted to you for your distortions.  I have known Paul since he first was elected in Texas.  He was a nice counterbalance to the liberal quagmire that was Harris County, Texas.  Our Constitution is as distorted by Paul as its going to be by the Obama supreme court appointees.  Its about preception.  Himmler and Paul both know this.

Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on January 16, 2012 at 11:11pm

From where I stand, Obama and Paul look equal, but opposite to the point they're reaching around the back to connect.  Extreme Fascism meets extreme communism.  Example; in accomplishment, what was the difference between Stalin and Hitler?

Comment by LOTTO NICK ! on January 15, 2012 at 9:46am

The problem with what you say is that particular BILL MAY HAVE  ATTACHED TO IT OTHER CRITICAL ITEMS that may have greater THE BILL ITSELF.

THAT IS WAY YOU NEED TO AS WHY HE VOTED THAT WAY,IT PROTECT SOME OTHER ITEM/ISSUE

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page