As all of us know, we are not a democracy (even though we use a democratic system to elect our representatives), but yesterday during a city council meeting, the hairs on the back of my neck went up when Councilman Warren Jones called us a democracy a couple of times in the context of his argument in favor of bill 2012-296. At any rate, it never hurts to post a contrast to these 2 very distinct types of governments, and as we all know the founders did not form a democracy because they DO NOT LAST and basically are the WORST form of government there is (kind of like having a football game but with no rules period..........imagine). Our country is a constitutional republic, and we should all get very angry when any representative tries to ignor the constitution by calling us a democracy..............I expect them to know better given the positions they hold!

.............................................................

Democracy versus Constitutional Republic

Most of you may already know this but I wanted to post this to make a point of why it is so important for us to elect a head of state……………..that is a Constitutionalist first and foremost…………………..

One of my pet peeves is how the word  democracy has crept to the forefront when referring to the form of government this country is suppose to represent when the actual form of government of the United States is a Constitutional Republic.

A pure Democracy is nothing more than mob rule with no provisions for the rights of the individual. The Founding Fathers saw this as one of the worst forms of government and in their wisdom provided a framework to secure the rights of the individual, ie., a Constitution and a Bill of Rights with separation of powers subject to Judicial Review which is the Rule of Law we live under.

True that we do elect our head of state and representatives by a Democratic system, ie., majority popular vote. (Although with the Electoral College and the Florida debacle that’s even in question), but that aside, once our head of state and representatives are elected democratically they are bound by their oath of office to uphold, obey and defend the Constitution, so help them God thus a Constitutional Republic.

A constitutional republic is a state where the head of state and other officials are elected as representatives of the people and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over citizens. In a constitutional republic, executive, legislative, and judicial powers are separated into distinct branches and the will of the majority of the population is checked by protections for individual rights so that no individual or group has absolute power. The fact that a constitution exists that limits the government's power, makes the state constitutional. That the head(s) of state and other officials are chosen by election, rather than inheriting their positions, and that their decisions are subject to judicial review makes a state republican.

Unlike a pure democracy, in a constitutional republic, citizens are not governed by the majority of the people but by the rule of law.  Constitutional Republics are a deliberate attempt to hold in check the threat of mobocracy thereby protecting dissenting individuals from the tyranny of the majority by placing checks on the power of the majority of the population. The power of the majority of the people is checked by limiting that power to electing representatives who govern within limits of overarching constitutional law rather than the popular vote having legislative power itself. John Adams defined a constitutional republic as "a government of laws, and not of men."Also, the power of government officials is checked by allowing no single individual to hold executive, legislative and judicial powers. Instead these powers are separated into distinct branches that serve as a check and balance on each other. A constitutional republic is designed so that "no person or group [can] rise to absolute power."
The original framers of the United States Constitution were notably cognizant of what they perceived as a danger of majority rule in oppressing freedom and liberty of the individual. For example, James Madison, in Federalist Paper No. 10, advocates a constitutional republic over a democracy to protect the individual from the majority. The framers carefully created the institutions within the Constitution and the United States Bill of Rights. They kept what they believed were the best elements of majority rule. But they were mitigated by a constitution with protections for individual liberty, a separation of powers.

The above was taken from the Ron Paul web site, and I want to thank him for providing such a great explanation.

Blogger post:

In searching for this on the 'net:

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Democracy: Two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.

Representative democracy: Two thousand wolves and one thousand sheep electing two wolves and a sheep who vote on what to have for dinner.

Constitutional republic: Two thousand wolves and one thousand sheep electing two wolves and a sheep who vote on what to have for dinner, but are restricted by a Constitution that says they cannot eat sheep. The Supreme Court then votes 5 wolves to 4 sheep that mutton does not count as sheep.

Liberty: Well-armed sheep contesting the above votes.

I found them, of all things, on a website that discourages voting.
http://www.insolitology.com/simplyanarchy/donotvote/pb/wp_b0...

Views: 357

Comment

You need to be a member of First Coast Tea Party to add comments!

Join First Coast Tea Party

Comment by amanda choate on June 28, 2012 at 3:54pm

What are the verifiable instances of voter fraud in Florida?

Comment by amanda choate on June 26, 2012 at 9:59pm
It just means exactly what it says. Gotcha.
Comment by Patricia M. McBride on June 26, 2012 at 9:13pm

Well there you go.  Obama ignores the constitution on a daily basis with his unitarian decisions and we no longer have domestic tranquility.  I don't know what you want, except I am quite sure you are looking for me to say something you can do a gotcha to.  Why don't you give me the liberal bent on what this says really, but please try to remember that the founders simply put these words to paper without any hidden meaning or the intention that someone would take one or two words and twist them into something totally different from the original words and intent.  You tell me what you think it means aside from what it says.

Comment by amanda choate on June 25, 2012 at 1:11pm
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,[note 1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
What does that say Patricia?
Comment by Patricia M. McBride on June 25, 2012 at 7:46am

Roma, the Romney thing is your opinion totally, and I for one consider him to be a far better choice than the man we have. No one is perfect and I mean every person who ran for this on the republican side. I think, now that he is the candidate, we have to give him every chance and am willing to do that. If he does not meet our expectations, we can replace him with someone else in 4 years, but at least we will have someone who loves the country and is a free market guy, and he has his work cut out for himself!

Comment by Patricia M. McBride on June 25, 2012 at 6:28am

Obama is nothing more than another Carter only far worse and far more dangerous, because he is not an American in any real sense of the word!

Comment by Patricia M. McBride on June 25, 2012 at 6:27am

I don't see anything in the constitution about it being the business of government to create sociatal cohesion. Where is that? They are supposed to abide by the constitution period and their oath to office, and I would expect them to at least know what our form of government is. I am not blaming Obama for everything our country is suffering, but I certainly blame him for being a UN guy instead of a president of the United States and acting in behalf of the UN and others who would destroy our country. I also fault him for befriending those who promote and are part of terrorism and openly welcoming them to be involved in our government when many of the groups are or at least were (before he took office) on lists of folks we didn't even allow to come to this country. I blame him for inserting himself in the Middle East and helping create the mess there now and for no not supporting our allies but instead choosing to side with our enemies.

Comment by amanda choate on June 24, 2012 at 8:32pm
The Egyptian military will assert itself and has hollowed out the presidency. All forms of government give rise to rebellion. We witnessed our own war against the government here. Lincoln was viewed as a tyrant. He recieved no electoral college votes in the South. It is messy, getting people to unite philosophically. But government is not religion. It is a means to create a society that both allows personal liberty and societal cohesion. Tough to do when you allow open disagreement. We should fashion governments that serve our needs and ambitions.
Comment by Patricia M. McBride on June 24, 2012 at 6:21pm

I feel so bad for the woman who was pregnant, but sharia will be bad for all women and these folks will move to make Egypt into another Iran (we can thank Obama for that as well as he has meddled in the middle east until it is a total mess and in an uproar just like he is doing here ............... he is a miserable human being and use that term for him loosely)

Comment by amanda choate on June 24, 2012 at 3:31pm

Dear John, you are the best of what America has to offer. I find your insights useful and informing. You are wise, strong, patriotic and good looking. Your kids are probably Rhodes Scholars, just like dad.

Your strong impulse to protect the heiracrchy is awesome to behold. Are you related to Einstein? He's too dovish for that, how about Reagan, are you related to Reagan? I love it when you post pictures, they are always so poignant. Or funny, you are a gas man, crazy funny. I drfeam of someday meeting you, your wisdom has changed my life. I know before I said I didn't want to friend you, I was wrong, And I want to do more than just friend you if you know what I mean. You drive me crazy.

Call me.

National Debt Clock

  

The First CoastTea Party is a non-profit organization. We have no deep-pocketed special interest funding our efforts.

You may contact us at:

First Coast Tea Party
1205 Salt Creek Island Dr
Ponte Vedra, FL 32082
904-392-7475

Helpful Links

Blog Posts

RYAN NICHOLS - Hardened Criminal?? Seriously??

If you're not already aware. This is what's going on in DC while dangerous criminals are allowed back out on the streets.  It's horrifying that this is happening to our citizens and veterans for protesting the hijacking of our election process. This is still happening! They are STILL being tortured and treated like full on terrorists. 

You may not be aware of the typical things they're forced to go through...…

Continue

Posted by Babs Jordan on August 14, 2022 at 8:44am

© 2024   Created by LeadershipCouncil.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service