I think many of us noticed what he said but considered the source of the comments as well.  Obama is totally clueless and apparently thinks it is ok for him to violate his oath to office.  He is also wrong about social security, because many will suffer damage that can't be repaired when the system is disbanded or changed and any coverage they paid for or might have had will disappear.  So it would have been better to leave people responsible for themselves instead of creating something which is a false hope and make people forget they ARE responsible for themselves.

September 9, 2011

Dear Supporters of the Constitution and our Republic,

Last night, in his address to the joint session of Congress, Obama made two of the most startling remarks coming from the mouth of a sitting President. However, the sentiment contained in those remarks is, unfortunately, shared by most of the politicians in Washington D.C. and around the country. We have come so far from the sound thinking of our Founding Fathers who did not trust a powerful central government and did all they could to create “chains” which would “bind from mischief” politicians of their day and those of future generations.

This distrust of the federal government, in particular, is clearly laid out in both the Federalist Papers and the Anti-Federalist Papers., the latter being largely unknown and unread by Americans today. The Constitution, itself, was a clear declaration of the great fear of the Founders that some day the people might again be enslaved by their own government. Therefore, the separation of powers, the clear and detailed enumeration of delegated powers, and the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution forge what the wise founders of this once-great Republic envisioned as “chains” to leash the natural consequence of government at any level: the tendency to grow and gain more and more power over the people. Fresh in their memories were the tyrannies of the British crown and the almost totalitarian control of its “subjects.” No more were the people to be considered “subjects” but the government itself was envisioned as being subject to the States and the People.

For those who rarely, if ever, read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, I will include the two most powerful amendments of them all in restraining centralized government and the schemes they would envision to amass power: (My emphasis added in bold print)

Ninth Amendment

“The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

Tenth Amendment:

“The Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States are reserved to the States respectively or to the people.

Compare these two short sentences to these remarks uttered by Obama in his speech: (about 29 minutes from the beginning)

“How many jobs would it have cost us if past Congresses decided (sic) not to support the basic research that led to the internet and the computer chip.”

“What kind of a country would this be if this chamber had voted down Social Security and Medicare just because it VIOLATED some rigid idea about what government could or could not do? How many Americans would have suffered as a result?” ( Emphasis added)

Comes now Obama, a self-described Constitutional “lecturer” admitting that violations of the Supreme Law of the Land can be justified for any reason if there be benefits to some areas of the economy. Of course, the socialist/communist theologians and their minions who would destroy our Republic, have historically bemoaned the inconvenience to their schemes posed by the Constitution of the United States. Their Machiavellian schemes have used Acts of Congress, judicial activism and the creation of “law” by decree, purposefully misinterpreting the plain language of the Constitution, and the institution of clearly un-Constitutional “Administrative Law” which is that “law” resulting from the millions of pages of regulations emanating from the vast bureaucracy which ignores both the Congress and the Constitution. This is not to mention illegal “Executive Orders” and “Signing Statements” issued by Presidents for decades—again, clearly un-Constitutional.

What struck me most, however, was the complete silence of the press and commentators on the above gaff committed by Obama. But should we really be surprised when these same apologists for bigger and more intrusive government have been beating the drum for decades in defense of the scoundrels who are perpetrating the destruction of our Republic and our way of life in favor of international socialism, domestic collectivism, and statism?

Our people MUST recognize that the STATE is not our friend—it is a fearful force like fire, which, if controlled closely, can accomplish limited and proper functions. In the case of a true Republic, the “fire” of the state is charged with protection of life and property rights, protection of individual liberty, and, most of all, protection from government itself. Like fire, the state, left to its own devices and unrestrained, can burn the whole house down.

article here:  http://patriotupdate.com/11954/breaking-siena-poll-shows-turner-r-u...