Welcome to the First Coast Tea Party
Mychal Massie: Obama’s terrorist attack on our children’s minds
I am sick at heart that the person residing in our white house is a communist and is pushing his rhetoric on innocent school children and all his warped ideas.
Speaking at Osawatomie High School, in Osawatomie, Kan., Obama said: “Now, it’s a simple theory. And we have to admit, it’s one that speaks to our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much government. That’s in America’s DNA. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. But here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It has never worked. It didn’t work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. It’s not what led to the incredible postwar booms of the ’50s and ’60s. And it didn’t work when we tried it during the last decade. I mean, understand, it’s not as if we haven’t tried this theory.”
Now, if you’re wondering what it is that Obama believes doesn’t work, Terrence P. Jeffrey, writing for CNSNews, succinctly summed up the president’s remedy for the rugged individualism he decries this way: “Americans must look to a more activist government that taxes more, spends more, and regulates more if they want to preserve the middle class.” (“Obama: Limited Gov’t That Preserves Free Markets ‘Doesn’t Work. It Has Never Worked’”; Dec. 7, 2011)
Obama, without question, voiced the most unambiguous endorsement and affirmation for communism ever made by an American president. It is yet another demonstrative proof that Obama embraces communism and that his primary goal is to turn America into a communist nation. Republicans (and quite frankly, Democrats, too) who are standing by silently allowing this Erebusic megalomaniac to spew his detestable and divisive rhetoric to the impressionable and malleable minds of children, are, in effect, openly supporting a terrorist attack on minds of America’s children. It is enough that public-school teachers teach such messages; the children do not need said message reinforced by the president of the United States.
Words fail to express the contempt I have for Obama as the leader of our nation. He condemns the very thing that made America great – and specific to that point, America was great before there was an Obama. It should be a punishable offense to allow him to undermine that greatness.
America is in denial to believe that he is not a communist doing everything in his power to forcibly and insidiously transform the nation into a communist state. It is misinformation for the media, political pundits and writers of opinion to report his actions in any other way. He is a manifestation of evil that threatens America in a way the KKK and al-Qaida could but hope to.
He condemns and attacks the very thing that allows him to raise a billion dollars for his re-election campaign, i.e., free-market capitalism. He no longer hides his Marxian belief of “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” He is the president – he represents an idea, a symbol of integrity and a presumption of knowing what’s right to the children he addresses. What child is going to stand up and say, “Excuse me, Mr. President, but you are wrong”?
Using words like “populist” to describe his speeches are attempts to put expensive perfume on a manure pile in an effort to make it smell and appear pleasant. But even if one were blind, that perfume only masks the smell until the pile is disturbed – then it smells again.
Obama is dividing this nation based on race and economic status. He is preying on ignorance and discontent that he is responsible for creating and fomenting. He condemns those who took the risks to achieve and create that which others also benefit from. He used the word fairness 14 times in his speech, in an attempt to demonize those who have achieved above others. Communism demands that there be income and wealth equality, not based on work or effort, but on a statist philosophy.
What is never pointed out is that the overwhelming majority of people are not inclined to take the risks inherent with starting a business. He simply chants the mantra that it’s not fair for some to have more than others, and it is his stated intention to change that. He is portraying himself as a champion of the working class who will take from the evil rich – who unfairly prosper – and redistribute their wealth as government sees fit.
There remains another question astute individuals will ask: “Why did Obama choose Osawatomie to deliver such a transpicously Marxist speech – considering that he and his ilk do nothing that isn’t meticulously calculated?” The answer to that question is another question. Could it be because Osawatomie was the Weather Underground newspaper published by Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn in the 1970s, or did it have to do with the abolitionist John Brown whose nickname was Osawatomie – unless you believe it was all just a coincidence?
Then there is the eerie similarity between the Weather Underground organization logo and the Obama 2008 campaign logo. There is also their use of “audacity” to bring about “socialism” in America, in the original newspaper written by Ayers and Dohrn. While it is unknown for a certainty who wrote Obama’s “The Audacity of Hope,” Ayers, himself, referred to it as more of a “political hack book,” suggesting that it was a disingenuous feint to the center written by committee. I reference it because language found in “Audacity of Hope” closely parallels that found in the Ayers-Dohrn communist newspaper.
Maybe the media, especially Fox News, should spend as much time researching and reporting Obama’s background as they did reporting unproven rumors about Herman Cain.
LINK: http://mychal-massie.com/premium/obamas-terrorist-attack-on-our-chi...
Views: 42
Comment
-
Comment by amanda choate on December 15, 2011 at 4:07pm
-
Fifth paragraph, protects, not protests
Last line, servicemen and women, not the singular.
-
-
Patricia, As I said, there is no one thing that eliminates Newt, it ismore like death of a thousand cuts.
Nancy Pelosi didn't run him out of the House, Republicans did while requiring him to pay a $300,000 fine. Ask Tom Coburn what he thinks of Newt. He said that Newt was the last person on earth he would vote for. Ask any of the people who served with him, the vote against him was like 393-6.
He served as Fannie and Freddie's lobbyist. He was FOR mandated healthcare as long as he was getting paid to say that crap. For cap and trade, although so was the entire Republican party except Ron Paul. US intervention in foreign lands without end, somehow that is now considered a conservative value. TARP, for it.
Please don't lecture me as though I don't not understand what makes a conservative. Just because I find no value in name calling doesn't mean I am without conservative values. That should not be the criteria. What should matter is this, no matter how it effects you personally, you maintain the intellectual honesty.
As a conservative I am for a smart, lean, effective government that protests the individual's right to life, liberty and the pursuit. That fosters and rewards those who invest in this country and its people. That treats all equally. That penalizes bad actors. That removes barriers that impede our progress.
That honors all of our rights.
And by the way....thank God we are finally out of Iraq. McCain would have us hanging around there with 20-30 thousand troops until the end of forever. Nothing will do more for us in the region than leaving completely. And even if that weren't true, which I believe it is, over 9 years is enough.
Welcome home to our serviceman and woman. Thanks for a job well done.
-
Comment by Patricia M. McBride on December 15, 2011 at 2:47pm
-
there is a difference between fact and personal opinions. I never try to make people think my opinion is more than my personal opinion. I said, and mean, I believe any republican running right now can beat Obama and will be so much better as president than Obama we will be pleased. I like Newt. I was around and old enough to remember what he did during the Clinton years. I was also around when Pelosi and her little crew of hachet folks went after Gingrich, and like Herman Cain, I think there might have been just enough there to convict him, but I am in no way convinced that he really was guilty of what he went down for any more than Cain was. But there was enough there that he got hung for it. I agree that we do have some wonderful people running and note you left Perry out, and I would never leave Perry out. He is a fine man, a true conservative, and although he has made a few blunders and isn't polished like Obama, I truly believe he would have made people proud (he has many folks in his state that love him).
-
-
Well then I am wrong. There are no salient points to debate Mr. Obama, just name calling. That won't work, unless you are a shape shifter like Gingrich and Romney. Ron Paul, Rick Santorum and Jon Huntsman are all more conservative than Gingrich. And each is just as electable, if not moreso.
-
-
Amanda,
I am sorry I didn't get back in before you had had a conversation with yourself (that is unless someone else made a comment and took it off). I know you are gracious to Mr. Obama, and I do not plan to be nice or speak nicely of him. He is a communist, he is trying to teach children about his ideology without the consent of the parents of those children. The man is mentally ill as they say about liberals. Mr. Massie is absolutely furious and many others including me, who watched that speech, if you could call it that, are furious. You apparently are not, and you also seem sure Obama will win the next election which is certainly nothing I believe for one minute. I think there are many, many people out there that are just as ripped as Mychal Massie is! And no, I do not plan to vote for Paul. I don't know who you support, but as I have tried to tell others, get out there and support them, and you shouldn't spend your time in here trying to tell others who they should or should not vote for!
-
-
....and that is all Newt Gingrich is, a bombastic response to Obama. I will say right here, he will not win Florida. He has no staying power. He could beat on Obama in a debate, but he can defeat him in a general election. There is no one thing that brings him down, it is the totality of his life that was the reason he hovered around 5% for months. But then Bachmann, Perry and Cain all imploded leaving Newt as the anti-Mitt and Newt once more emerged for scrutiny. And now two weeks after snatching the lead his numbers are dropping like a stone as everyone remembers why they rejected him in the first place. Can Santorum make a run? Huntsman? Bill Bennett called him the most conservative candidate in the race. We have to stop being angry and start talking about real conservative values, from real conservatives.
If Massie wants to rip into Obama, do so. But do so in a way that we further the argument, not fall back into name calling and feel good about ourselves rants. It is a waste of time. And time is running short.
Personally, I have not heard one candidate engage Obama on this speech. Why not?
I hear all of them talk about staying in Iraq forever, except Paul, Since when did endless occupations of foreign lands become in our national interest. More importantly, a conservative value?
-
-
Patricia, all I was saying is that the author gives these other reasons as to why Obama gave his speech there. Honestly, those reasons diminish his argument. To build an argument, you quote the speaker, in this case Obama, and then refute them one by one with reason and rationale.
The author does not quote Obama once in his diatribe. And being only a diatribe, it lacks any lasting value. There were plenty of points in that speech that lent themselves to argument. for instance:
I am here to say they are wrong. (Applause.) I'm here in Kansas to reaffirm my deep conviction that we're greater together than we are on our own. I believe that this country succeeds when everyone gets a fair shot, when everyone does their fair share, when everyone plays by the same rules. (Applause.) These aren't Democratic values or Republican values. These aren't 1 percent values or 99 percent values. They're American values. And we have to reclaim them.
Massie could have spent his time refuting this view of collectivism. He didn't. He chose emotional catharsis. I just don't have time for that, nor do we collectively. It may feel good to do so, but it is self gratification.
-
-
He did and he chose that location on purpose. He also tried to convine the children of our county right afterwards that our free market system does NOT work and never has. You can get into that, right, Amanda? What a great guy we have for a president. He has nothing to do with what most people believe in, nothing to do with the things most people raise their children to believe in but what the heck, who cares about that huh Amanda, because he is just a great guy.............right Amanda????
-
-
I thought he spoke there because Roosevelt gave a famous speech in Osawatomie?
National Debt Clock
The First CoastTea Party is a non-profit organization. We have no deep-pocketed special interest funding our efforts.
You may contact us at:
First Coast Tea Party
1205 Salt Creek Island Dr
Ponte Vedra, FL 32082
904-392-7475
Helpful Links
Blog Posts
RYAN NICHOLS - Hardened Criminal?? Seriously??
If you're not already aware. This is what's going on in DC while dangerous criminals are allowed back out on the streets. It's horrifying that this is happening to our citizens and veterans for protesting the hijacking of our election process. This is still happening! They are STILL being tortured and treated like full on terrorists.
You may not be aware of the typical things they're forced to go through...…
ContinuePosted by Babs Jordan on August 14, 2022 at 8:44am
© 2024 Created by LeadershipCouncil.
Powered by
You need to be a member of First Coast Tea Party to add comments!
Join First Coast Tea Party