If we haven't already had enough bad news, this came onto the radar from the conservative republican women facebook page. It originated from The Blaze (Glenn Becks news web site). His highness, the Obumbler, signed executive order 86 which basically takes control over 16% of the country's population all of whom live in rural areas. This is totally scary, and this fellow can't be gone fast enough to suit me!
Excerpt from the article:
President Obama signed his 86th executive order (13575) on June 9, which established the White House Rural Council (WHRC). According to The Blaze, the Executive Order seems to be in line with the United Nations radical Agenda 21, as it is designed “to begin taking control over almost all aspects of the lives of 16 percent of the American people.”Evidence of this can be found in Section One of the Executive Order, which reads:
Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present enormous economic potential. The Federal Government has an important role to play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for economic growth, promote innovation, improve access to health care and education, and expand outdoor recreational activities on public lands.
As the Executive Order references “sustainable rural communities,” it raises a few eyebrows, since that is one of the key phrases found in the UN plan for sustainable development known as Agenda 21. The order admits that it intends to seize greater power over “food, fiber, and energy,” items that are key to human sustenance.
The mission and function of the White House Rural Council, according to the Executive Order, is as follows: “The Council shall work across executive departments, agencies, and offices to coordinate development of
policy recommendations to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in rural America, and shall coordinate my Administration’s engagement with rural communities.”
The order has no qualms about revealing the levels of authority it hopes to achieve. In order to reach the mission set out, the order states it will “make recommendations to the President, through the Director of the Domestic Policy Council and the Director of the National Economic Council, on streamlining and leveraging Federal investments in rural areas, where appropriate, to increase the impact of Federal dollars and create economic opportunities to improve the quality of life in rural America.”
Analyzing the language of the document, The Blaze questions, “is there a hint that a ‘rural stimulus plan’ might be in the making? Will the Federal government start pumping money into farmlands under the guise of creating ‘economic opportunities to improve the quality of life in rural America?’ ”
The order also states that the WHRC will “coordinate and increase the effectiveness of Federal engagement with rural stakeholders, including agricultural organizations, small businesses, education and training institutions, healthcare providers, telecommunications services providers, research and land grant institutions, law enforcement, State, local, and tribal governments, and nongovernmental organizations regarding the needs of rural America.”
In other words, the federal government will seemingly control every aspect of rural America.
read the rest of the article here: http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2011/06/23/11-325/
Comment
A piece I emailed to my distribution list today which will be of interest.
He cites a report by Jeffrey Eisenach and Kevin Caves of Navigant Economics, a consulting firm, which examined the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act’s subsidizing of rural broadband, designed to bring broadband access to homes without it.
The two authors looked at three areas that received direct grants or loans from the stimulus package: southwestern Montana, northwestern Kansas, and northeastern Minnesota.
They calculated that it cost $349,234 to bring broadband to each previously unserved ousehold!
But “it’s actually much worse than that,” according to Schulz, DeWitt Wallace
fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
The Montana area included in the stimulus funding has as many as seven broadband providers, including wireless, and “there were only seven households in the Montana region that could be considered without access,” Schulz writes.
“So the cost of extending access in the Montana case comes to about $7 million for each additional household served.”
And Obama wants you to TRUST HIM ???? and the Democrats who can't read that theie Govt. can run a National Health Care program "OBAMACARE."
???? LOL
All,
Beginning July 11 at 7PM on WFOY1240AM we will be doing 1 hour discussions on agenda 21 and what it means to you. This Monday night it will be a little background and property rights. We have the next 4 weeks for agenda 21, pass the word and tell everyone to listen in.
If you're not already aware. This is what's going on in DC while dangerous criminals are allowed back out on the streets. It's horrifying that this is happening to our citizens and veterans for protesting the hijacking of our election process. This is still happening! They are STILL being tortured and treated like full on terrorists.
You may not be aware of the typical things they're forced to go through...…
ContinuePosted by Babs Jordan on August 14, 2022 at 8:44am
© 2024 Created by LeadershipCouncil. Powered by
You need to be a member of First Coast Tea Party to add comments!
Join First Coast Tea Party