Comment

Comment by Barry Lee Phillips on September 3, 2012 at 5:34am

Helen,  You're welcome.  Agitation is normal in this forum and I can take it as well as give it.  However, sometimes you have to dismiss the class and tell the children to go out and play with the other kids.

Comment by Helen on September 2, 2012 at 10:38pm

Lee, thanks for the response on the credit card question.   Glad you didn't take the bait.. agitation is in full swing now it appears..

Comment by amanda choate on September 2, 2012 at 7:27pm

Sorry, I was just joking.

Comment by amanda choate on September 2, 2012 at 2:10pm

Maybe an implanted device to determine if you are properly regostered? State implants it in you and then can determine if you are eligible to vote. Seems foolproof to me.

Comment by Barry Lee Phillips on September 2, 2012 at 9:54am

Baiting me is not going work and neither is putting words in my mouth.  Bye!

Comment by Barry Lee Phillips on September 2, 2012 at 9:43am

"Why would you want to deny that voter fraud exists with the help of the Federal Government?"

I never said or implied any such thing.  That's like asking, "When was the last time you beat your wife?"

That dead horse is now beyond recognition and I buried it.

Comment by Barry Lee Phillips on September 2, 2012 at 9:24am

That dead horse is becoming more unrecognizable by the minute.

Comment by Barry Lee Phillips on September 2, 2012 at 9:19am

Amanda, part of an article in Red State on those 180,000 people states:

"Non-citizens are able to become registered voters in Florida because if a non-citizen checks the box on the voter registration form that says they are a citizen they are registered to vote, because the form is signed under oath.

Those registered who are identified as possible non-citizens are reported to the State Attorney?s office The States Attorney may charge anyone who unlawfully registered to vote with a felony."

So, some of those people may have LIED UNDER OATH in order to vote illegally.  Yet another reason to insure the integrity of the election process.

What is a real stretch is your conclusion that requiring 900,000 people in Pennsylvania who do not have i.d. to have valid i.d. to vote smacks of Jim Crow.  You are totally ignoring commonplace everyday demands for i.d. for virtually all transactions of any significance in today's society.  And that would include Pennsylvania.  Do I have to list them?  If these people are too ill, too incapacitated, too poor, or too anything else, then I am sure there are fellow citizens and family members in Pennsylvania who would help them acquire the necessary i.d. to vote.

Comment by amanda choate on September 2, 2012 at 8:43am

The argument is that only people with valid ids vote. Then we hear that 180,000 people in Florida have valid id though they are ineligible to vote. So what, id is not the answer obviously.
True the Vote is funded largely by AFP. It was started in Houston by the thr King's Street Patriots, a tea party group. Non-partisan is a bit of a stretch.
In Pennsylvania over 900,000 people do not currently have the id necessary to vote. Most of these people are poor or elderly. It reeks of Jim Crow. I for one would prefer a poll tax. It is a more straightforward approach to keeping the poor at home on election day.

Comment by Barry Lee Phillips on September 2, 2012 at 8:26am

Okay, you insist on beating a dead horse.  My driver's license states:  "Florida The Sunshine State  Driver License Class E".  Sighhhhh.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page