Thank goodness.  Maybe this will stop this over the top meddling in private business on behalf of the union against the best interests of our economy and the companies they are ruling against.

August 10, 2011
The Wall Street Journal
Melanie Trottman

The National Labor Relations Board is hurrying to push through a raft of decisions by year's end, when a pair of vacant board seats could leave an important part of the agency hobbled indefinitely.

At the same time, congressional Republicans and business groups, unhappy with recent NLRB enforcement and rule-making initiatives, are signaling that they will try to block any new board nominees President Barack Obama might put forward.

"I'm going to create a high bar for any future nominees," Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) said in an interview. "Given its recent activity," Mr. Graham said, "inoperable is progress."

When Chairman Wilma Liebman's term expires Aug. 27, the NLRB will have just three members on its board—two Democrats and one Republican. That is the minimum number needed to make major new rules. The board would shrink to two when Democrat Craig Becker's term expires Dec. 31, unless Mr. Obama fills one or both of the vacancies before then.

With Ms. Liebman on her way out, a flurry of activity is expected in the coming weeks. Among the issues pending at the NLRB are an overhaul of the rules governing union-organizing elections and the agency's challenge to a decision by Boeing Co. to locate a jetliner-assembly operation in a nonunion factory in South Carolina.

Other cases test whether unions can organize multiple, small groups of workers in a single facility, and whether employees should continue to have a 45-day window in which to challenge workplace unionizations that use a "card check" vote instead of a secret ballot.

"They want to finish as many of the major cases as they can," said agency spokeswoman Nancy Cleeland. "That's what they do at the end of a term, and they try to be as productive as possible."

Mr. Graham is one of several Republican senators who have attacked the NLRB for challenging Boeing's decision. While it was the agency's general counsel's office, not the board, that filed the complaint against Boeing, the lawmakers see the two arms of the NLRB as one.

Both arms, run by Obama administration appointees, have angered business groups and Republicans in the past two years with a series of decisions they say grant unions organizing power at the expense of companies and job creation.

Sen. Tom Harkin, (D., Iowa.), chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee, has said he would fight Republican efforts to stymie the NLRB in connection with the Boeing case.

"Republicans in this Congress have shown an alarming willingness to disrupt the basic functions of government to advance their partisan, antiworker agenda," Mr. Harkin said through an aide. "With nominees pending from both parties, I hope that we can reach a fair compromise and confirm a package of nominees."

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said it was likely to pressure the Senate to resist board nominations. "We'd have to look at the candidates, but given the track record, it's probable that we'd try to get the Senate to filibuster a candidate," said Randy Johnson, the Chamber's senior vice president for labor.

The Supreme Court ruled last year that a board of just two members at the agency would lack the authority to issue case rulings. That could mean gridlock come January for 250 pending cases, ranging from whether graduate teaching assistants are students, rather than employees who are eligible to organize, to whether employees can legally criticize their workplaces on social-media sites.

Read the rest of this post on the US Chamber website at:  http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/article/labor-board-races-to-m...