The White House and a morally elastic media have insisted we suspend disbelief and swallow a few whoppers in the past, but this time they’ve gone overboard.  Let me see if I have this straight:  the neck-nuzzling, pro-Islamic party line is that Dzhokhar “Jahar” Tsarnaev, the surviving terrorist from the Boston Marathon bombing, is just an average 19 year old college kid.  Really?   Like many others I did some goofy things at 19, but it never really occurred to me to make a bomb for the purpose of killing or maiming people despite murderers-turned-professors Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, and Kathy Boudin suggesting it an acceptable form of expression at that time.

We didn’t know this punk-terrorist’s name a couple weeks ago but now the government states emphatically that he has no connections to foreign terrorist organizations.  Really?  It’s past time to quit treating citizens like idiots and admonishing them like children to not rush to judgment, but not according to Napoleonic Janet and her boss.  If they say this is an isolated instance and there is no radical Islamic connection, we’re supposed to believe them and not ask questions.  Well, sorry, but I have a question:  is it possible they and DHS operatives have been so busy monitoring and labeling law abiding veterans, Christians, and conservatives that they were too busy to make note of a terrorist returning to the U.S. from Chechnya and ignored several tips from the Russians?  It would appear so.

We’re not being attacked by Icelanders, Danes and Swedes, so how could they have missed this psycho?  I vehemently reject and resent the fallacious suggestion that the two murderers just sat down one night as they shared a bag of Orville Redenbacher’s popcorn in their apartment and said, “Ya know what we ought to do?  We ought to set off a couple bombs at the Boston Marathon this year.  Let’s go to the new Target store out in the suburbs, score a couple pressure cookers, and see how many people we can nuke.”  I’m sure it was just as spontaneous as that.  I am sure there were no outside influences.  I am sure they acted alone.  According to the government it’s inconceivable that they conducted their jihad with impetus and direction from radical Islamists bent on the destruction of the United States.  And how do we know?

Because “Jahar” told the feds he and his dirtball brother acted alone, that’s how we know, and we’re supposed to believe this murderer is telling the truth.  We’re told the blame belongs at his brother’s feet and that the younger deliquent was manipulated into participating in the killings.  The media and administration are knee-deep in dreck and shoveling a story about an unsuspecting, kind-hearted, and trusting young lad who unfortunately ended up a part of this despicable assault, not that having a breathing tube inserted in his trachea and being on life support systems would provide any incentive to tell the feds exactly what they want to hear.  His life isn’t worth 25 cents in my opinion, and it would be considered worth less if he were to betray the Islamic handlers with whom he was and is still affiliated.

What would they expect this dying cur to say?  To provide all his contacts and spill his guts about the people with whom he and the other scurvy mutt were affiliated?  And, if he discloses one thing, how is that to be believed over something else he might say?  This terrorist pond scum killed or filleted nearly 200 people, and now he’s credible?  He bragged at parties the nights following the bombing that he did it.  He killed an MIT peace officer.  He carjacked a citizen at gunpoint, but now he’s sharing tenable and reliable information?  Give me a break.  I was born at night, but I assure you it wasn’t last night, yet the gibberish emanating from the Oval Office is akin to FDR hitting the radio waves after Pearl Harbor and suggesting citizens not rush to judgment about the Japanese.

The president is required to recite the following oath:  

“I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and do to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” 

There is no caveat or codicil which suggests the president during times of war is to tell us to go easy on the bad guys and to try and understand them, so why is he doing so?

The silence of the Muslim community at large is as deafening as the blasts at the end of the marathon.  There is no groundswell of emotion or displays of indignation at the heinous acts in Boston or anywhere else around the world, just the predictable claims of discrimination and tired laments about being misunderstood.  Well guess what.  You can keep trying to sell that sorry act, but Americans are no longer buying.  Since April 15^th there have been 53 Jihad attacks and 4 suicide bombings worldwide, leaving an additional 279 dead and 734 critically injured, but our president tells us we mustn’t be judgmental of the religion of peace.  Why not?

It must be difficult to be the president and always be wrong.  Such consistent failure flies in the face of descriptive bromides and adages developed over the years to soften life’s blunders, such as a broken clock is still right twice a day, or a blind pig can still find an acorn.  Even Quasimodo had Esmeralda, unrequited as was his love, but breaks in the downward spiral of bad mojo never turn out in favor of President Obama and the reason is he does not believe empirical data.  Here’s a tip:  you might not like facts, but you can’t succeed by simply ignoring them.

Because of his ideological groundings he has refused to admit that government spending will not energize the economy and that intrusive government is the enemy of free enterprise.  He has stalled the Keystone Pipeline with half-wit economic and environmental assertions.  He misjudged the Arab Spring (or enabled it, depending on one’s point of view) then doubled down by providing the now, radical Islamic state of Egypt with a couple dozen of the world’s most sophisticated fighter jets at no charge.  He stuck with Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State despite her ineffectualness, naivete, and lack of worldliness and experience, and lied to protect himself and her after they gave up our heroes in Libya for slaughter.  Nobody can prove who authorized the sale of guns to Mexican drug cartels, but we all have a pretty good idea who hatched the plan.  He insists more spending will somehow miraculously alleviate debt, lured members of congress into his lair of influence with bribes and intimidation to pass a completely unaffordable health care dream, and either cannot or will not identify our sworn enemy.

He is content to remain the champion of societal terrorism as a uniquely bizarre and imbalanced means of governing a country, and instead of providing answers or solutions to unify he appears happiest when there is mayhem and discord among constituents, for he believes, wrongly, that uncertainty will funnel increased power into his grip with a mandate to rule.

Such are his demons, for he carries an overtly ingrained hatred of American traditions, morals, and beliefs, as well as the laws and protocols that made the country great, and his mentors never told him how difficult it would be to tear them down.

Link:  http://mychal-massie.com/premium/always-being-wrong-is-hard/