Comment

Comment by William Korach on February 19, 2011 at 12:04pm

I am afraid our Mr. Stephenson is a provocateur. He keeps using those left-wing Tea Party bashing terms "Islamophobe, homophobe, bigot and racist." He wishes to bait us, but does not demonstrate that he shares our value of personal liberty, and small government. 

http://www.rockoftherepublic.com

Comment by Armando Delgado on February 19, 2011 at 8:59am

Mr. Stephenson, most of the correspondents in this blog are polite and perhaps affraid of being accused of bigotry. I am neither. So I will tell you what I think. Every one of your postings is intended to irk and irritate this group. You obviously do not agree or believe in the same ideals that we cherish, so why hang around? We are not interested in your religious ramblings or hidden political agenda. Your facts are distorted or presented out of contest just to contrariate. You are nothing but a fool and an ignorant jackass. (I appologize to the First Coast Tea Party and its members if my bluntness offended any one)

Comment by William Korach on February 19, 2011 at 8:09am

Mr. Stephenson:

I have attached the link to my book "Rock of the Republic" a history of the influence of Christianity on American law. It offers overwhelming evidence that prayer was very much a part of public life and scholastic life for over 350 years. Benjamin Franklin called for prayer at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Harry Truman stated that we got our laws from Moses on Mt. Sinai and Jesus Sermon on the Mount. In America we have freedom of religion not freedom from religion.

http://www.rockoftherepublic.com

Comment by Joe Story on February 19, 2011 at 12:45am

In light of all the comments I guess I posed this in the wrong place.

 dispute over Religion

• Posted by Rick Story on February 17, 2011 at 6:05am in Sample Title
• View Discussions

 

Taxes are one of the many issues facing us as a nation today. Another one perhaps more important to our very survival is Religion.

Thirteen colonies each with its own version of Christianity fought with determination, driven by the fear of government (state) controlled religion, for a constitution that would allow individual freedom of worship. Yes, each and every colony recognized the existence of God the Father, Jesus Christ His Son and the Holy Spirit which indwells the Christian life. The battle was over ecclesiastical accession, which version of Christianity was best.  Every state constitution sought the protection and guidance of Almighty God. Not a single one disavowed the existence of one Almighty God and the need for His protection.  http://www.usconstitution.net/stateconst.html

A comprise reached for the first amendment “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” was in large part reached at the insistence of Rhode Island. They recognized that in matters of religion no man can control the thoughts and aspirations of another. Each of God’s human creations must arrive at what he believes on hi

Comment by Peggy Hall on February 18, 2011 at 8:27pm

Billie, you outdid yourself.  Girl how the heck do you think up all of these wonderful things to say.  You go girl.

Comment by Valerie Sawyer on February 18, 2011 at 7:40pm

I guess that's why the first Congress always opened in prayer, they published a Bible that was to be used specifically in the schools and required citizens to a sign a statement declaring their allegiance to Jesus Christ before they could hold public office. John, stop trying to rewrite our history. If you don't want to be a Christian, don't be. But don't rewrite American history.

Comment by Barbara Ciulla on February 18, 2011 at 4:35pm

The muslim brotherhood are here all over the united states, obama knows it and can't wait for them to build their mosques and live among the rest of us with their sharia law and our own laws until they start blending....who knows.    but I do know that if they want the right to continue their stoning and beating and killing right on our soil.  they are already doing it and get in trouble with our laws right?  so they want their laws right here and don't want us to interfere with our laws.  I know I'm not that articulate, but I'm working and can't articulate well right now.  you know what I mean. 

Comment by Joanna B McDermott on February 18, 2011 at 4:04pm

Thanks Roma - we are getting it from all sides.

Comment by William Korach on February 18, 2011 at 4:01pm

In fact the poll was conducted in May 2010. I agree the uprisings in Egypt and other places in the Mid-East are against authoritarian rule. But the Muslim Brotherhood represents 30% of the vote in Egypt, opposes the treaty with Israel, and supports Sharia Law and Jihad. Since Egypt controls Suez, through which most of the world's shipping flows, the Muslim Brotherhood is a potential threat to US national security.

Comment by William Korach on February 18, 2011 at 2:42pm

Mr. Stephenson below is naive if he thinks that Radical Islam is not a factor in Egypt. In a recent Pew poll in Egypt 49% say they favor Hamas, 82% favor death by stoning for adultery, and 85% favor the death penalty for any Muslim who converts to Christianity. Wake up, a bad moon is on the rise.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page