Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Roma and Tom Cox on January 23, 2012 at 8:26am

P.S.  I thought all that stuff was too far fetched to be true until I saw the IMF and WTO websites say it in writing.  I mean what idiot would want to rule the world? But I guess that naive attitude is what allowed Hitler to get as far as he did.

I recently heard this on the news.  We taxpayers are paying for this!!! I did not even know there was such a thing as an International Republican Party, and International Democratic Party.   But sure enough, here are their websites.

http://www.iri.org/discover-our-mission-0

http://www.ndi.org/whatwedo

The news said  Egyptians stormed their compound in Egypt, and took their records and equipment.  

http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/29/world/africa/egypt-ngos/index.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45815943#.Tvz6-HpXHHJ

The news said McCain was chairman over the International Republican Party. Do they know we did not elect them to nation build, or to be "world leaders"?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Roma and Tom Cox on January 23, 2012 at 8:47am

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Chuck Riddling on January 23, 2012 at 1:59pm

Some of the reasons I will be supporting and voting for Newt is , I'm sick and tired of the democratic party and the news media deciding who I will have to vote for in the presidental election !! Last time they gave us McCain, I liked both Newt and Herman Cain and you see what the media did to Herman with three women from "Chicago" who no one has heard from since he dropped out . Now they have attacked Newt, but he slapped back and he will do the same to Obama. Anyone who gotten close to Romeny, the Media has gone after them, If the media says Romeny is the one who can debate Obama, I look it as Romeny is really who Obama wants to debate and not Newt. I'll bet you there is not one Congressman or Senator in D.C. who hasn't cheated on his wife execpt "Barney" maybe, and look at "Bill" oh! thats right they're democRATS and anything goes and it's ok, but republicans have to be clean as the driven snow.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Roma and Tom Cox on January 23, 2012 at 2:09pm

Well John, you have without a doubt  confirmed that Gingrich is Obama with a new face.
John said:

Here's some more good info on Newt!

Jack Wright said:

John, if that were true then Romney wouldn't be pissing his pants and spending millions of dollars attacking Gingrich and Santorum right now would he? That would really be a waste of money when according to you he already has the nomination sewn up. Not to mention that if Ron Paul were any kind of a threat he would be getting bombarded with ads against him right now too wouldn't he? Sorry but from a logical perspective your assumptions just don't hold any water....................

 

PS Do the math.

Not on VA ballot

Not  on Missouri ballot

or Ohio, Tennessee, or Illinois….

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Roma and Tom Cox on January 23, 2012 at 4:50pm

The Heritage foundation explains that the Idea of Isolationism was a word started out by the Progressives/ liberal Democrats to undermine the constitution and the Foreign policy of the Founders. They explain it this way:

"

There is a renewed popular interest in the foreign policy approach of America’s Founders. Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall and nearly a decade after 9/11, many are unsatisfied with U.S. foreign policy and have called for a reappraisal of America’s objectives, means, and national interest. Foreign policy observers from Walter Russell Mead of the Council on Foreign Relations[1] to Congressman Ron Paul[2] have also called for a new paradigm in American foreign policy, one that seeks inspiration and guidance from America’s Founders.

There are, however, many misconceptions about America’s early foreign policy. Perhaps no misunderstanding is as widespread as the belief that the Founding Fathers of the United States were isolationists who made non-interventionism their guiding principle.

The erroneous belief that America’s early foreign policy was isolationist is a fairly recent one. According to historian George C. Herring, the term isolationism did “not become fixed in the American political lexicon until the twentieth century.”[3] The term itself soon came to be understood as the antithesis of the increasingly trendy concept of internationalism. By the end of the 20th century, few objected when historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. described America’s reaction against Woodrow Wilson’s internationalism as a return to the “womb” of “familiar and soothing isolationism” which, according to Schlesinger’s Progressive narrative, had been articulated by George Washington and Thomas Jefferson.[4]"

See full article here;  http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/12/the-myth-of-isolat...

It is not enough anymore to vote for someone because they wear the Republican label.  The progressive/ liberal democrats have infiltrated the GOP.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Roma and Tom Cox on January 23, 2012 at 5:50pm

I am not too crazy about Stossel.  I personally like Doug Wead better.  I have met him, and he is a very reputable conservative and historian.  Here is what he says about Ron Paul's Foreign policy.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Chuck Riddling on January 25, 2012 at 12:09pm

To all politicans and canidates, Here is one of the main reasons I'm confused, How does and how can one trust canidates who talk crap and try to destroy the other canidates by any means necessary, THEN ! six months later one comes out in support of the same one who has been destoring his or her campain. I know we need Obama OUT ! but I don't trust anyone republican, democRAT, or independent, who changes his or her feelings just because the other canidate won the primary election. If I don't like you NOW, I'm sure as hell am not going to like you next week or next year. Don't tell me you are going to govern by the constitution , because you have already proven yourself to be a liarer in your campaining to get elected and I will never trust you no matter what !  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Roma and Tom Cox on January 25, 2012 at 12:18pm

Chuck, I am not sure I understand your comment, but I think you are agreeing with Jim DeMint

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Chuck Riddling on January 25, 2012 at 1:16pm

Frustation and trust no politicans ! when a politican dies you can't just bury them you have to screw them into the ground because their so crooked, I guess I'm just disappointed with those in office and those trying to get into office, including the TEA Party canidates, It's to bad we can't take points from each canidate and make one because each and every one has their good issues, and I know any of the canidates are way better than what we have now.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jack on January 25, 2012 at 2:03pm

I agree Chuck, the problem with that is that negative ads work. if you don't think so just look at Iowa. Romney bombarded the media with negative ads that destroyed Newt in that state. There isn't enough people like us with the ability to see beyond the propoganda. Politics is a dirty business and unfortunitly anyone with integrity does not stand a chance. Herman Cain was drawn and quartered because of false allegations, all of which could be linked directly back to Barack Obama and David Axelrod. There never has been and never will be a perfect candidate. Negative ads work and that is just the way it is and it would be naive to think otherwise.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jack on January 25, 2012 at 6:18pm

Herman Cain quit because it was just to much for his wife and family. The candidates themselves are not the only one that gets raked over the coals when they run for office. Their families become targets too and as a husband, father, grandfather and family man is was an honorable decision on his part to gracefully bow out. I personally wish that he had stayed in, I think that it would have eventually been proven to be nothing but lies and he would have recovered and bounced back stronger than ever. I wish that he would have stayed in the race but Im not in his shoes and I cant say under those circumstances that he did the wrong thing by protecting his family. As for auditing the federal reserve, I have the comment on dvr, he didn't say not to audit the fed, he didn't say that we wouldn't find anything if we did. His actual comment to Ron Paul was that he could go ahead and audit the fed if he wanted to but with all of the other issues facing this country it wasn't one of his top priorities. He had also said in another interview that I listened to that "yes he would audit the fed but that it wasn't one of his top priorities. His top priorities were 1st to throw out the old tax code and replace it with his 999 plan, 2nd to eliminate the epa and all of its burdensome regulations and 3rd to get the people of this country back to work." and if you ask me that is more important right now than auditing the federal reserve. That can be done after we get this economy working again. He never said not to do it, he just said it was not a top priority..............................
 
John said:

Chuck, look at their records... What have they said? Of course many will slant what they say, but listen close to what they mean. For example, the first time i head 0ßama speak, i knew in my gut he was a liar. A political liar! The worst kind!

I can give you my opinion, but then you would just be taking my word. What you get from what they say will mean a lot more than anything... but their past is who they really are!

Jack, if the stories about Herman Cain were not true, why did he quit? If they weren't true and he folded under the pressure, DC would eat his lunch! But for me, his folly was that he said we would not find anything by auditing the federal reserve! Poor judgement or conflict of interest?!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jack on January 25, 2012 at 7:28pm

It was unconstitutional until we passed the 16th amendment. If you had done as much research as you claim to have done then you would already know that. You would also already know that Hermans 999 plan was just the first step to getting the Fair Tax passed. 999 was the first step, repealing the 16th amendment was the second step which is actually the first step of the Fair Tax. So no it wasn't half baked. The Fair Tax is the most extensively researched piece of legislation to ever be introduced before congress. Millions of dollars of private unbiased research has been done on it by economists. To call it half baked is just about the dumbest thing a person could say. It is a national sales tax that eliminates the entire tax code, eliminates the IRS, eliminates federal income tax, eliminates medicaid and medicare taxes, eliminates the death tax and about a dozen other taxes along with corporate taxes. It eliminates the embedded taxes in american manufactured goods emediately giving them a competitive edge over goods manufactured in the rest of the world. It eliminates taxes on repatrioted funds held by businesses over seas, instantly creating TRILLIONS of $$ of new capital to come back into this country. Which in turn will emediately bring business, jobs and manufacturering back into this country sparking an economic boom unmatched in the history of the world. Half baked my a$$, 999 was just the first step. But if you had done half as much research as you claim you have done, you would already know that but considering your uneducated comment I think some more research on your part would be in order.

 

As for him quitting, it was a personal judgement that he made in what he considers in the best interest of his family and I can not fault him for that even if I do not agree with his decision. Believe it or not but they are not true. Everyone of his accusers can be traced back directly to Obama and David Axelrod who is Obama's muscle and right arm man. Hell one of them even lived next door to Axelrod in the same damn apartment building. Do the research on that too while your at it. All you have to do is go to google.com, it will come up on the first page. 

• ▶ Reply

▶ Reply to Discussion

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• …
• 28
• Next ›
• Page